Mr Bridge
card fan

mrbridge.co.uk

for BRIDGE Magazine, holidays and much more

Welcome to our Community!

If you want to take part in the discussions, sign in or apply for membership below.

Reverse?

edited May 2007 in All Things Bridge
Is it a reverse? A question form a recent game with friends is unresolved please help! 1S, PASS, 2H, PASS, 3C. As the openers 2nd bid is lower ranking than their first, is it a reverse or just a natural 2nd suit? Does it show a strong hand or just a weak or moderate hand in Standard English ACOL? Advise welcomed please as we all discussed at great length!

Comments

  • edited 11:30AM
    The formal definition of a Reverse is this. If opener bids two suits and if it is necessary for responder to give preference to the first suit at the three level, then this is a reverse. It is strong (normally 16+ pts.) it is forcing and forcing to game if response is at the 2 level. Normally, opener has more cards in the first suit than the second. However, in the example quoted , which is known as a high order reverse, opener could have 5 cards in each suit. Alternatively, because it is a forcing bid,opener might only have CAK. Note that the sequence 1C NB 1D NB 1S is not a Reverse even though the second suit is higher ranking than the first. Responder can give preference with 2C. (TV)
  • edited 11:30AM
    For years there have been arguments about what does and what does not constitute a reverse to the confusion of generations of beginners. Using the Barrier principle the term "reverse" is redundant.

    It's so simple. If you bid above your barrier you are showing 16+ and the bid is forcing.
    JackC
Sign In or Register to comment.